cool hit counter Tips for recording a song from a yardstick_Intefrankly

Tips for recording a song from a yardstick

I don't know if I'll get beaten up for writing about this here~

Lately, I've been enjoying recording songs, It's not as high as writing, arranging, playing and singing your own songs., And it's not a self-playing song.( This can be followed by), It's not as easy as going to a studio and paying money to just sing.。 It's on your own computer., Cover some of your favorite songs., Entertain yourself a bit.。 So the only thing to do is: Find an accompaniment+ record a song+ post-blending=> exports。 Recorded some of them in succession, Kind of got some insight, Share this.。 purely amateur+ novice to, I would be grateful for your guidance.。

About the accompaniment

The accompaniment that can be found online, This is how I would rank them from highest to lowest: original accompaniment> Adapted accompaniment( Live version included)> KaraOK accompaniment> Go to vocal accompaniment, Combined with the consideration of sound quality, This ranking is not so absolute, For example, when you really can't find a high-quality original accompaniment, I would consider switching to a quality adaptation orOK accompaniment。 Basically low quality and de-vocalized I wouldn't consider, I'd rather not record than settle for。 The sound quality spoken of here, I don't want to take anything without damage320/128K These indicators say something, Just one word.: feel

  1. Original accompaniment . There may be several versions of a song in circulation, and the arrangement of each version is often different, such as those sung by different people (Luo Dayou and Cai Guoquan's "Childhood"), those sung by the same person at different times (two versions of "Old Tracks" by beyond), and those sung on different occasions (in the studio and at various concerts and so on), but the arrangement (which I think is the chords, instrumental music and rhythm), I think, is the most important thing of a song, it directly determines the temperament or style of a song, and ultimately affects the feeling of listening to it . So finding an accompaniment is really a matter of finding a specific arranged version of the soundtrack . There is no definition or answer here as to what the original version is, I think whichever version you find most pleasing is the original ~ even if it is some live version and everything else is a rework . If you can find the original backing track that you have in mind and the sound quality is still good, it's the ideal situation to say that things are halfway done and you can happily start recording the song .
  2. Adapted version of the accompaniment . It is said above that the arrangement has a great influence on the style of the song, so the accompaniment with similar arrangement naturally brings out a similar feeling, so in the case of not being able to find the original accompaniment, it is not a bad idea to choose a modified version of the accompaniment with similar arrangement, the key is still to see whether the feeling is the same, for example, Yuan Fengying's two versions of "If There Is Love In Heaven", and also the studio version and 91 live version of "Grey Track" by beyond . Examples of inconsistencies are the studio version and the 91 live version of "Earth" by beyond, and the plugged-in unplugged version of "Hotel California" . In addition, the similarity of the song style, in addition to giving a relatively consistent listening experience in terms of feel, has practical implications for backing diy, which are discussed below when talking about post .
  3. Karaoke version accompaniment . Simply known as the OK version of the backing track, the best feature of this backing track is that it comes with a damn good main melody . It's the singing session where there's always a shrill tone (similar to a xiao flute sound, I think it's a midi electronic tone) following you around, haunting you, which is fine where the background music is high pitched and not too heard, but in places like the A section it's too distracting to listen to, especially in songs like "Next Year Today" (Eason Chan) where the A section soundtrack is sparse, if there's that tone that will definitely ruin the backing track . So why this annoying main theme, I guess it's still because there's a need, having wandered through some singing threads, there are really people who can't get away from the sound and can't actually sing without it ~ allow me to ponder that for a moment

So this sound seems to be called the lead vocal tone again . In any case, fortunately the sound is still good enough to get it killed with as little loss of the rest of the soundtrack as possible, so it can be used in the absence of a suitable original and reworked accompaniment . Also, the OK version of the backing track may not be the same as the original except for the lead vocal, and the rest of the soundtrack may be different, for example, some instrumental, harmony or something may be missing, so in any case, it's up to fate to find the backing track .

  1. Go for the vocal accompaniment . Er~ This, it's the same feeling as watching a gun version of a movie, no matter what .

Here are a few places where I look for accompaniment .5sing Xilaiju UU Accompaniment Network Fine accompaniment network China Accompaniment Network China Performing Arts Accompaniment Networkwo99 5sing and wo99 are basically free, the first (the latter site is a bit shitty), the rest basically charge, but there are always some exclusive quality accompaniment, a song is only a few bucks, okay, but there is a recharge starting price this is a bit nasty .

About the recording

Being an amateur player and not having studied vocally, I don't have much to share about the singing technique piece, more listening and singing definitely helps .

The specific singing and recording process I do not know what the professional practice is, my practice is headphones broadcast accompaniment, people singing into the microphone ~ this sentence is a little waste, the purpose is to record only the vocals in, so do not say must not use external audio, that is, headphones are to try to avoid leakage . I've seen people ask if the correct posture is to record the accompaniment and vocals together, uh ~ even I know that this is extremely unscientific, outside the recorded accompaniment can still be listened to, if you sing along with the real instrumentation is compared to being in the real world to take a picture, then the accompaniment audio + vocal synthesis is equivalent to the portrait P into the landscape, and the accompaniment and vocals recorded together is equivalent to the scenery picture printed into a scenery board, after the person standing in front of the same photo, which effect is the worst needless to say .

About Listening, audible wet take down a job、 Listen to Dry Record Dry these practices, mediate wet It's actually two parameters in the reverb effect, But here's the dry/ wet I think it's a general reference to the lack of/ Treated vocals, So listen. wet Recording dry means when you sing, What you hear in the monitor headphones is the sound with various effects added, Can be close to the final output, It can also be the effect of preliminary touch-ups, Here's a listen. wet, Meanwhile the audio software records the unprocessed dry sound, It's called recording.; Listen dry record dry naturally means that what you hear in the headphones is what you record; As for whether or not to listenX record wetThe practice, I don't know, and even if there was I imagine it's pretty niche, because records are about authenticity and adding effects in would be much less malleable . Anyway, there should be no guidelines on which approach to adopt, but rather depends on the preference of the person singing, I have tried both, listening to the wet will make you sing a small intoxication, wow ~ I sing so beautifully, do not sing well to yourself ~ huh, is probably to play a motivational, more into the role of it, but the downside is that even if the singing is not so good is not exposed, the final may only intoxicate themselves intoxicated others; listening to the dry benefit of course is to expose the problem in order to correct in time, the downside is that there may be a blow to confidence ~ ha, especially people with poor voice, there is no mood to finish the song is difficult to say, and is too much attention to the skills of the words, may ignore the emotional input, the final effect may be nothing flawed, but also mediocre, but not good . I guess professional singers with good voice conditions would choose to listen to the dry bar, but there must be a professional recording lion in the professional studio, he must listen to the dry and find out that something is not right and it should be NG, the singer just sings to his heart's content . I don't know if I have to listen to my own voice professionally, but after trying different monitoring practices, my current practice is not to monitor, that is, only the accompaniment in the headphones, after singing, how the singing, playback to see, this seems to be a bit blind, but I just feel that no matter listening to wet and dry, it is a kind of interference for me, listening to wet is easy to blind intoxication, listening to dry is hindered by emotional involvement .

Next is the equipment . The equipment I know and the way they are wired is this drop . The microphone → the computer motherboard → the sound card → the → . Here in turn are my very rough knowledge of these devices, just knowledge, not science, not reviews, not guides, because I don't know them all myself and write them more in the hope of getting pointers: .

  1. Microphone

A decent Microphone/ A microphone is a must., Of course different levels of players are interested in“ up par” There are different definitions, Scum level like me.,200 Anything around that would be considered decent( How could I possibly tell you that I started out recording with the headset I got with my computer?), Basic details can be recorded, For example, air exchange、 A low hum or something., But a few recorded songs, Still feel the need to upgrade, It's just that you still tend to pop when you yell high notes., It's not that high of a pitch., just as wellbeyond《 distantParadise》 It's just that pitch., That's why you have to be conscious of the distance when you get to the high notes., This affects the coherence of the singing somewhat, So the next step is to get a new one500 Try this level of block。 Let's get back to business., This Mac stuff is deep.~ It's like every piece of equipment is so deep., From tens to hundreds, They can be in the tens of thousands.。 Roughly, I only know that there are condenser mics、 moving coil mic, I simply interpreted the difference as: Large pickup range for condenser mics、 Excellent ability to capture details; Moving coil mics have a relatively small pickup range、 Not as good at capturing detail as condenser mics。 Based on this feature, Netizens have conclusions, If your voice is okay., If the recording environment is also quite quiet, Then get on the condenser mic.; Instead, put on a moving coil mic, It naturally helps you beautify your sound and reduce noise~ Probably an analogy to the beauty mode of mobile phone selfies, Too much detail is sometimes not a good thing。 Speaking for myself., It's a condenser mic.~ That's not a disguise for saying my voice is okay., It's a clear statement.

  1. Phantom power . This is an optional device, that is, only condenser mics need phantom power, moving coil mics do not . Most sound cards and audio amplifiers nowadays basically come with phantom power, with a 48V button or toggle switch or something, as follows .

You need to turn it on if you plug in a condenser mic, not if you plug in a dynamic mic . If the amplifier and sound card come with the device in the back, then you can save this device, but of course you really want to add a separate one, you can have the money to do whatever you want .

  1. Word Release . Short for mic amp, this is something I've only read a few web articles about and serves a necessary purpose, not a sauce device . What it does, as I understand it from my humble perspective, is to adjust the volume of the microphone recording, that is, the same sound, the recording volume is different, the decibels of the audio you get are different . High recording volume means high sensitivity, that is, very small sound can be recorded, but high recording volume is often brought about by a large bottom noise (people who have used the integrated sound card that [microphone enhancement] will know, this function I think is a software microphone, the effect can be imagined), so the advantages and disadvantages of the microphone amplifier I guess is probably reflected in the bottom noise control, can increase the recording volume as much as possible at the same time to get a small or close to no bottom noise is said to be good . In addition to raising the recording volume on this basic function, I see that the microphone will also bring some other functions, such as what analog input to digital output, sound saturation, etc ., specific do not understand, you can look at This article . , looks very professional . Also, similar to the phantom power supply above, in the lower segment of this market of entry, many sound cards actually already come with their own mic amps, so there is no need to get a separate standalone mic, and those who need a standalone mic already don't need to read this one from me, point me in the right direction . But to be clear, not needing such a separate device does not mean that the function of the microphone amplifier is not needed, it is just integrated into other devices as a module, that is, in the whole recording session, the microphone amplifier is necessarily present, just in a different form .
  2. Sound card . Probably the sound card is the more familiar device compared to the ones above . Since a long, long time ago, is a computer motherboard comes with an integrated sound card, microphone and audio directly plugged into the motherboard can be used, pink port green port everyone is familiar with . So the question is, why pull the above bunch of stuff when you have an integrated sound card that plugs into a mic and works? Here's the thing, let's review, if the mic is a condenser mic, it needs phantom power, and an integrated sound card ~ who has seen an integrated sound card with phantom power? Anyway, I haven't seen it, so If it's a condenser mic plugged into an integrated sound card, phantom power is indispensable ; Of course if it's a moving coil mic, just plug it in . And what about the mic amp, the integrated sound card comes with it ~ although it's pretty crummy . To summarize . For computer recording, the minimum equipment required is a mic, and if the mic is a condenser mic, then a phantom power supply .It feels like it's better to express this meaning in clear code: a mic + an integrated sound card is guaranteed to record sound into the computer, though! Better recording of the voice into the computer is what we are after . The above said that the wheat as a pickup device, naturally, can not be slagged, then the sound card and what is said, I think the first thing to find out is: integrated sound card can record a good song or not? My answer is: I can't . Reasons: ① The integrated sound card comes with a speaker that is too crummy . I believe that we all have an experience is that even if the recording volume is adjusted to the maximum, you have to be very close to the wheat or even paste, in order to record into the appropriate decibel sound, to be far away, you must resort to [microphone enhancement], but at the same time bring a lot of noise, which also recorded what song, voice chat is okay; ② weak performance . I think most computer users have a concept of graphics card performance, such as a high performance graphics card that can run large 3D games with high effects, can render video effects faster, transcode video faster, etc ., and the opposite is not sexually beneficial . But the performance of the sound card may not be so conceptual, in fact I had no idea before I started playing with recording songs, the little I probably know is that when making MIDI music (that is, back in the day, DIY a bit of mobile phone ringtones and so on), a good sound card has more instruments and tones available, in fact, I can't say I have a good idea even now, so what follows is some more white talk, and I sincerely seek guidance . Low-performance sound cards mean inefficient audio data processing, which is directly reflected in the significant delay in recording sound into audio editing software . For example, sing along with accompaniment, you think the rhythm is very accurate, but when you play back you will find that there is no point at all, my situation is the overall delay of about 1 second, which is a considerable delay, so you have to manually drag the clip forward, on the accompaniment . In addition to the large noise delay, other problems I have not found, such as sound quality, no feeling worse than 7, 800 independent sound card, of course, better sound card I have not experienced, perhaps good to a certain extent to reflect it . So for recording songs, a decent independent sound card is necessary, but very ashamed, I can not give any advice, I use an external sound card less than 800, as far as the current feeling is OK, at least not mentioned above the integrated sound card noise, the problem of large delay, anyway clearly recorded the vocal and some small voices into the problem, but there is still a bottom noise problem, that is, from the wheat 10 to 20 cm distance to record the appropriate volume, need to record the volume knob to a larger position, At this time will get a clear bottom noise, but also far from the integrated sound card microphone enhanced noise so big, but this noise still has to be in the late noise reduction processing, of course, may have a UPS power supply with my soles, this cargo fan noise is not small, I believe that if the sound card grade can go up one or two gears, the bottom noise problem can be improved . Also here I do a little pointless reminder that the independent sound card is divided into built-in and external:

Don't make the mistake of thinking you have to have an external one to call it a discrete sound card, or that an external one is better than an internal one, I think the main thing to look at is the price . Like the two sound cards pictured, while the external one looks cool, it's much cheaper than the internal one . Also note that there is a good chance that the internal sound card does not come with phantom power, talk amplifier and all that stuff, so you need to add them separately, while the opposite is true for the external, and in that sense, the internal sound card seems more professional . Speaking of which, there's actually a problem I've been trying to get around but can't, which is the sound card sound card, what the hell is it, what exactly is it doing, or what kind of function the device has/can be called a sound card, say it's professional, we have to figure out what it should have done, specialize in these things can say it's dedicated, do a good job can say it's professional, and the rest of the functions are all considered additional/extra/dog take the function . The question was asked, but I really can't answer it

I'm not sure I can understand those concept explanations in the encyclopedia, so here's another plea to the high and mighty passing by to bestow my knowledge with your layman's language and sassy rhetoric . me guessFor example, the sound coming in from the microphone is an analog signal, the sound card is responsible for converting it into a digital signal so that it can enter the computer, in the form of files and streams, everything in the computer is digital, which we all know, on the other hand, it is responsible for converting the audio data in the computer into an analog signal that can guide the work of the pronunciation device (speaker audio), that is, digital/analog conversion I think is certainly one of the necessary functions as a sound card . But for the original is a digital signal in (such as with analog-to-digital conversion amplifier is a digital signal into the sound card), with a digital signal out (such as accepting digital input mixer), like the upper grade sound card has SPDIF input and output interface, this case the sound card's digital-to-analog conversion function is soy sauce, then what it is doing ~ do not know, so in addition to digital-to-analog conversion I do not know anything else about the work of the sound card, by the way, there must be a function, is to let the computer recognize it as a sound card, so that in the audio device to select it as an input/output device .

In addition to the native functions of a sound card, and the aforementioned phantom power, and talk amplifiers, often some external sound cards come with their own effects, reverb, hi-bass excitation, tuning wet and dry, and whatnot, and even things like this .

This is no longer a sound card with a mixer, but a mixer with a sound card, it has a USB port on the back, and when you connect it to your computer you will recognize it as a "sound card" . These sound cards with effects can process the sound before entering the computer, which is equivalent to recording in the sound already comes with a variety of cool and dragging effects, which is more suitable for online karaoke . But it's not necessarily a good thing for recording songs, and I think the most important thing about capture sessions is to record as much detail and realism as possible, recording, filming, data capture, and other capture-type work . Adding effects to the sound, in essence, for the original sound is a kind of damage, plasticity is also much lower, such as reverberation, the original sound in the words, increase and increase the small is a matter of adjustment, but the incoming if the big reverb sound, to reduce a little reverb can not be so easy, even if you do it is inevitable damage, so rarely heard listening to the X recordings wet The approach, BTW, of that mixer pictured above I considered it at first, but on second thought I was playing recording not karaoke and gave up on it .

var devices = new ArrayList();

 devices . Add(microphone);

 if (microphone is capacitive microphone)
     devices . Add (phantom power);

About the post

My process for this latter piece is this . Whole accompaniment, recorded vocals, added DUANG, output, split (ZHUANG) enjoy (B) . Actually, it's not quite accurate to say [post], because sometimes it's recorded while tuning, and the singing is done when the accompaniment is whole, so I should say it's done on the computer side, or mixed and shrunk . The software I use is Adobe Audition, version CC, or AU for short, below I may say it as CC, other similar software is not used, but below I am not too involved in the specific operation of the software, this is not a tutorial, just insights, expect the operation method of partners may have to let you down .

  1. The whole accompaniment . The backing tracks that I find often have things that are not as good as they should be, such as the sound quality not being able to catch up to the original, the reworked intro and outro not being as tasty as the original, the live version having audience shouting at the beginning and end, the tempo being slightly faster and slower, the pitch being higher and lower, the sound image not being right, the highs and lows not being right, having the main melody sound, etc . ~ so the perfect original backing track is so valuable that you don't have to bother . A basic principle of my whole accompaniment is to use the original song where I can . So the approximate composition of my accompaniment is this: original intro + accompaniment + original interlude + accompaniment + original coda, as shown (I usually put 1 track for the original and 2 tracks for the accompaniment) .

I will even use the original song for a few seconds, the overall purpose is to get the effect close to the original accompaniment, so since we have to mix, then the difference between the two styles can not be large, a ballad and a heavy rock is not too incongruous, so the above-mentioned accompaniment said, even with a modified version of the accompaniment, but also to find a similar to the original song . The first thing to deal with in a mix is ① pitch (or vocal tone), duration, both of which I use the original song as a guide to adjust the accompaniment, although there are exceptions, that is, the pitch of some original songs, we such non-singers may not be able to take, so the appropriate rise and fall key according to their ability is sometimes necessary, no shame . The duration affects the tempo, so it also has to be unified with the original song . Both [Stretch and Change Tone] are attributes of clips in CC, sharing two adjustment modes: Real Time and Rendered . There is a longer rendering time after choosing the latter, but it must be endured for the ideal effect; ② The fusion problem at the broken knife . This is basically a fade in and fade out, but the specific point of difference has no guidelines, everything according to the feeling; ③ sound and image, high and low bass do not match the problem . Some accompaniments feel left-right, too sharp and too muddy compared to the original, which requires adjusting the sound image and balance to lean towards the original; ④ Main melody problems . I did it via the center channel extraction method, but parameter adjustment is a delicate task, and the goal is to just kill it off as much as possible without damaging the rest of the soundtrack anyway; ⑤ lack of harmonic issues . The harmonies in some songs are quite important, less will lose a lot of feeling, such as Beyond "Live and Let Live", how to do it, how to do it yourself, but first you have to know how to sing, and the harmonies are often not a melody with the lead singer, which I have no good way, only rely on each person's golden ears to go inside the original song hard to identify the sound . I won't go into the other issues of volume and such, it's easy to adjust the level or dynamics processing .

  1. synecdoche。 Get the accompaniment ready., Then it's time to have fun singing., I don't know if a professional singer recording wouldNG Repetition of certain phrases, I would anyway., All in one go unless it's not a difficult song, The main problem is not enough air, Can sing tired, be forced topause Take a break and sing.。 Here's a little bit., Professionally it's supposed to be very much about the technique of changing air, And the dantian.、 odor、 Tremolo or something., It's not a high bar for singing anyway, Ordinary people shouting performance shows are usually singing, But when you think about it, there's a lot to be said for it., It's not just about having a good voice and pitch., Kind of like.c#, easy entry, But to go deeper there is also a mystery, That's why I admire people who can sing and dance well~ The premise is true., There are already so many things to master to sing a song well, And you have to jump and dance., Maintain table shape~ It's not easy.。 But take away the technical stuff, There's another important thing I think about singing a good song~ likes and dislikes, Even more than technology, sung performance, It is an interpretation, If you can convey the meaning of a song through your singing voice, you're good at it., So we'll find a lot of songwriters、 band, Their song., Covers by other professional singers often don't sound as good as the originals、 tasty, for exampleBeyond《 sweetheart》、 escape plan《 The brightest star in the night sky》, These are all tunes that have been covered by professional singers, But I never felt as good as the original.( No black and white factor here., Just speaking for my own feelings) The moving of the coming, There's certainly a preconception here, But I think there must be an emotional element。 Actually most of the band members I think are made up of people who like to play instruments, Their training in vocal music should be inadequate compared to professional singers, Singing skills alone may be able to be slinged by the latter, But music is not a perfect product, It's about feeling, Flaws are also part of the feeling, Getting it done is the feature, Or the imprint, No one else can imitate it, That's about feeling, How can an outsider be profound with those involved in the creation?, It's like the most expert user can't have a developer who knows his program。 There's another example from Gunflint《Don't cry》, There may be some skill in that voice that I don't understand., But I will say this.~ be done, It's hard to imagine another good voice singing like that。 Examples of pure skill are those demo discs of covers by lesser-known professional vocalists,《 lilac》《 Love is you and me》 wait, voice、 The technique really can't be any better, That vibrato, Where you feel the trembling, it will tremble, Where there should be no tremors, there is no tremor at all, Quite accurate, Can say the perfect singing method, It's nice, too, but~ It just about not as good as the original song, It needs to be explained, I didn't disparage the rapper's idea, Just make my point。 Let's get back to business., I'll only do a few tricks at the moment when it's handled,① Noise reduction。 This is strictly not a treatment of vocals, But in[ permit] Get started with the device conditions, but it was a deal that had to be done。 originallyCC Comes with a good adaptive noise reduction effect, But the problem is that it doesn't follow the noise detected by the first clip, It's about every clip“ adapt” one time, So if the knife is broken, the front of the knife in the back1 Seconds or noise, Unless you set aside in front of each clip1s around“ adapt” Give it period., I've tried quite a few third party noise reduction effects for this, onlywaves ofX-Noise Stereo It feels good, Now I'm using it,CC It's thrown with you。 But noise reduction should be moderate, After that, it will destroy the sound of people;② Demysting。 The tooth tone is hairZ/C/S high-frequency sound, The problem of Chinese songs is not obvious, Cantonese songs are inevitable, Some songs like Chen Huixian's are clearly de-toothed,E I think there is one too~ I haven't sung and I haven't heard much, The tooth tone is catalyzed by the high-pitched excitation effect, It could be very obvious, If there is a tooth tone in a lyric, it's going to make people feel very harsh, There are a few words in a row that you can't hear, The whole song is heardsssss sound, How else to appreciate, So the tooth tone has to be processed as well,CC Bring your own sumwaves DeEsser It's all good, It should also be moderate, After that, it will destroy the high frequency, Create a feeling of vocalism。BTW, I found that Chen Yuxun used a unique way of pronunciation to artificially demyst off teeth, It's hisZ/C/S It will be posted as close toZH/CH/SH musical note, It's about not letting the tip of your tongue touch your teeth directly, Instead, avoid it., That's not much of a dentition.,《 Next year today》 more obvious, There is no need to separate, nor is there any need for water to be separated., It feels a little weird, I don't know if he did it intentionally to kill his teeth, It's still a personal habit;③ equilibrium(EQ) and motivation。 Both can be used to accentuate trebles or bass~ is to make the sound clear or thick, But the two effectors are different, Can be used together, Tune out the tone that matches the temperament of the song;④ reverberation。 There are many tunable parameters for reverb, There are several effectors that come with it, There is a simple sound reverb and a reverb that simulates a sense of space, I didn't play very well, either。 The basic rule is, The smaller the reverb, the stronger the dry sound, The closer you get to the original tone, On the other hand, stay away。 The big reverb sounds rather ethereal、 Melodious, But at the same time, it masks the original sound characteristics, So most of the songs that highlight singing don't reverberate。 Reverb this thing is even if the singing is not good, Adding reverb also feels a lot better, You can compare softening in picture processing, Very good at covering up ugliness and creating a forced grid, So it's probably going to be popular with amateurs, But I suggest this thing be restrained, Everything comes according to the temperament of the song, Some songs require an ethereal feel, Like Lu Guanting's《 Love all your life》, Then increase it., Some of them need to be sunk., For example, Eason Chan's《 Next year today》, Adding significant reverb is not good。 In short, it's a big reverb. wet Sound I think is a very amateurish approach, You can't cover up ugliness just for the sake of it, To paraphrase the idea of image processing,P It's a little too much, It's time to get some work from singing, Reverb is poisonous。 Here's another interesting example, Anita& Liang Chaowei's《 Who's with the sword?》(TVB86 edition《 Rely on the sky to slaughter dragons》 Theme song, Exposed age), It is obvious that the reverb given to two people is not the same, Listen to it for yourself, The two are different professionals, That's very understandable。BTW, I have accompaniment to this song, I'd love to have a female voice with me;⑤ echo。 This is mainly used on special segments, Like Zheng Yijian& Chen Xiaochun's《 One is to accompany》 ofA segment, There is a proper echo, And some of the shouting in the song, The right amount of echo can add color。 moreover, Mastering as an effector, The actual inclusion of the balance mentioned above、 incentives、 reverberation and other effects, It is a comprehensive tuning station, However, each effect is less adjustable than its own stand-alone effector。 In addition to the above treatment, I don't know much about anything else, To be explored。
  2. After DUANG is finished is the whole song re-listen, there is not the right place appropriate adjustment, it is best not at this stage to fix the singing and recording of the bug, this need to be in the singing and recording session in time to fix, because this time may not find that feeling, and when it comes to re-singing, it is also best to be a whole section of the re-singing, alone to make up a couple of lines is not good with the feeling of the front and back of the line . Also, some songs require different effects for different sections of the song, perhaps a clearer section in A, a more majestic section in C, or even different effects for different phrases, so vocals may need to be split up on several tracks by section to apply different effects, and phrase differences use a broken knife to apply editing effects . After everything feels good, export the mix, my preset is generally CBR 256k mp3, finished using mp3tag such as tag editing tools to write tags, speaking of tags, I want to spit a lot of players, including mobile phone players, are only recognized tags do not recognize the file name, nima provide an option for the user to choose will die ah, or the file name and tag title at the same time to display difficult, now more and more software shouting content is king, do services, do applications, you can make money, but can not be a little to do tools of craftsmanship, I really want to day this gang of product dogs .

Finally, the amateur recording thing I think is like taking pictures, it's all about keeping something, apes/women, record him a song or two if you like to sing, or go to a studio if you don't want to bother, just take an artistic picture . By the way, having said all that, it seems a bit like leaving a picture without a song or two, so, to offer .


1、Big Dogs Intensive Blockchain White Paper on Bitcoin VIII CombiningandSplittingValue
2、Hacking team announces completion of full version of Switch system hack release in spring 2018
3、See the light again after the falls Copycat what exactly does USDT which is often seen on exchanges have to do with the US dollar
4、Suspected memory leak found in MySQL or above
5、U hold on Guangdong Broadcasting Network takes you flying the winner of the Canton Horse cant keep up

    已推荐到看一看 和朋友分享想法
    最多200字,当前共 发送