Will computers have true intelligence?

John Hiller's "Chinese Room" thought experiment is interesting in that it begs the question, what is intelligence?

Howard Gardner, a professor at Harvard University, developed the theory of "multiple intelligences", which divides intelligence into seven dimensions.


logic (loanword)





Introspection (self-awareness and nature awareness)

If all seven of these vectors were required to be fully developed, I wonder if many of us would be ashamed to admit that we are intelligent beings as well

Regardless of the definition, what happens if we put an AI that fits these seven vectors into the "Chinese room"? Even an AI with seven fully developed items would be denied by the Chinese room. This is because it does not know the oracle bone script and does not understand the cross-reference between the oracle bone script and Chinese. Even if it gives the correct answer, it is still not recognized as an intelligent being.

In fact, according to Hiller's updated version of the Chinese Room, even if a person memorizes the oracle and Chinese cross-references and gives the correct answer, he is still not intelligent - because he does not understand the meaning. But even people aren't intelligent beings anymore, are they the only oracle experts? Isn't the conclusion of the "Chinese room" a bit unbelievable?

Computers are capable of having intelligence, and this is already becoming a reality.

If we look at AI by seven vectors, we find that AI has made great strides in six vectors - language, logic, space, physical functioning, interpersonal, and natural cognition - and it seems that there is only one area of music that AI has yet to fully capture - but in fact, news has broken that AI can already compose music in imitation of Bach - without knowing, of course, if it knows why it composed it.

The people who oppose AI having intelligence seem to be left with a saving grace - AI doesn't know the implications of doing that. But does it really matter? What does it matter if you know the meaning when you can do it and do it well - better than anyone else? Just like AlphaGo outplayed a human at Go, even if he didn't experience the joy of Go, does that negate its ability to play Go?

With the ability to learn, and with unlimited resources to learn, an AI with a particular expertise might quickly grow into a super AI.

So what's next for the Super AI? I don't know, imagining what a superintelligence with broader than human intelligence, superior computational power, that doesn't get fatigued, isn't affected by emotions, and consumes less would do is like what ants imagine humans would do to them.

Survival or destruction is only at the whim of that super intelligence.

It's come to this, and it's useless to say no, I'm scared. The fate of mankind was probably doomed from the day computers were invented, and there's no use being afraid, just keep moving forward.

If there is success, there must be destruction. So do people.

pay attention to sow discord and listen to the present , and I talked about poetry.

1、Blockchain notes the poetry and the far reaches of blockchain applications
2、Chow Dafu and GIA provide diamond identification certificates to consumers through blockchain
3、Yin Yang Shi January 17 update maintenance announcement new style gods descend on Heian Jing
4、Happy Miner True Blockchain will soon be on the trading platform Free Mobile Mining Project
5、Foxconn plans to commission selfdriving ferry at US plant

    已推荐到看一看 和朋友分享想法
    最多200字,当前共 发送